Petition to protect our kids from judidicial misconduct
Sign link petition click here: thepetitionsite.com/4/petiton-for-the-death-of-us-district-court-/
The history shows that judges who are considered corrupt, bias and even criminal in their judicial acts on the bench when decisions are made directly related to the merits of a case are rarely prosecuted or held accountable.
And when these acts, judicial misconduct in nature, are allowed and given permission by law- the judicial act, criminal in nature continues. This gives the higher courts the ability to adopt and and rubber stamp the denial of your human rights that results from the deliberate wrong decision where injustice takes place and this defeats the whole purpose of obtaining what we call as JUSTICE.
Everytime a deliberate wrong decision is made adopted and rubber stamped by the higher courts, the wrong decision will be considered law that actually contradicts the history and current law that speaks in your favor. When this happen then these appears in the law books as published law completely contrary to each other. The courts then can take the law they just created on you, misconduct in nature, and use this caselaw to deny other people around the nation their human rights contrary to the law and history that addresses the same exact issue of facts and law that’s in your favor.
For example, in Jaben V. United States, 381 U.S. 220-221, with respect to the statue of limitation, That United States Supreme Court ruled that a preliminary hearing must take place and be completed when a criminal information is filed by the prosecuting attorney inorder to toll the time of limitation unless the criminal case is supersede by a criminal indictment.
Bustamante V. Distrrict Court of the third judicial district, et al, 138 colo page 105, the Colorado Supreme court held with adoption that time is material and must be alleged in an indictment or information when the crime is alleged inorder to toll the time of limitation, 138 colo page 104. The court went on to hold that Colorado is now to be numbered among those jurisdiction where the act alleged in the indictment or information must appear to have been committed within the period prescribed by the statue of limitations or an exception must be setforth such as being a fugitive from the state. 138 colo page 105. The court if the date alleged in the formal complaint is outside the statute of limitation its time barred. Page 105.
In the year 1994, the supreme court went contrary to the above ruling: holding that the statute of limitation was tolled 1990, before a county court complaint was filed in the county court. In that case, a district court information was not stamp filed in the district court until Dec 23, 1992. The crime was alleged to have happen oct 14, 1989. No indication of being a fugitive was alleged in the complaint. Higgins was alleged to have committed theft. Colo statute of limitation on theft was three years. See higgins v. people 868 P2d 371(colo 1994).
Take notice of how the colo. Government uses this case law in other cases throughout the years when putting Higgins v. People, 868 P.2d 371 (Colo.1994) case law in google search engine. And you will not find in google search engine Higgins v. people itself. That fraud by the colo supreme court cost me 8 years. Higgins v. people involved the same facts and law as the above cases but it ruled completely contrary to the entire judicial history dealing with the colo statute of limitation in criminal cases.
When your case finnaly makes it to the United States Supreme Court like Higgins v. people, on a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, the supreme court is not looking at the wrong being done to determine a grantal of a writ of cert. The supreme court only considers as the important of the issues to determine whether this issue raise, effects the nation as a whole. And if the lower court never raised the issue as it effects the nation as a whole, the supreme court will deny your petition without a single reason behind it. Infact, your denial will come from the supreme court clerk- His name is Higgins.
If your issue only involves the wrong done to you when complaining in the petition for writ of cert, its guaranteed to be denied. Or did the supreme court even look at the petition since it was denied by a clerk. Nevertheless, these judges are not only protected through the adoption and rubber stamping by the higher courts, but 28 U.S.C. section 351 to 364 gives judges permission to make wrong decision so long as this decision is done in their judicial capacity.
This permission and ability to make wrong decisions is actually apart of the judges judicial independence. This is why a judge is considered powerful.
I’m requesting the people of America pursuant to the 10th amendment to the United States Constitution to help me change and be a part of history, changing that law that gives judges the permission to make wrong decisions even very wrong decisions in their judicial capacity. All judges are required to be fair and impartial and should and ought to be required to make what thgey believe to be correct and fair decision even if the decision is wrong. Because that would be true appellate error. Corruption is not appellate error. It’s a crime. Appellate rules only apply to appellate errors.
Please click on the above link: and read how God perceive my understanding and sign the petition so I can petition to enforce transparent and account ability corrupt judges who deliberately commit crimes on the bench. No judges are above the law and we are not beneath the constitution….
Please, I also seek donations of pay perclicking on google pay per click site, to the above linked petition.
Petition to protect our kids from judidicial misconduct
The history shows that judges who are considered corrupt, bias and even criminal in their judicial acts on the bench when decisions are made directly related to the merits of a case are rarely prosecuted or held accountable.
And when these acts, judicial misconduct in nature, are allowed and given permission by law- the judicial act, criminal in nature continues. This gives the higher courts the ability to adopt and and rubber stamp the denial of your human rights that results from the deliberate wrong decision where injustice takes place and this defeats the whole purpose of obtaining what we call as JUSTICE.
Everytime a deliberate wrong decision is made adopted and rubber stamped by the higher courts, the wrong decision will be considered law that actually contradicts the history and current law that speaks in your favor. When this happen then these appears in the law books as published law completely contrary to each other. The courts then can take the law they just created on you, misconduct in nature, and use this caselaw to deny other people around the nation their human rights contrary to the law and history that addresses the same exact issue of facts and law that’s in your favor.
For example, in Jaben V. United States, 381 U.S. 220-221, with respect to the statue of limitation, That United States Supreme Court ruled that a preliminary hearing must take place and be completed when a criminal information is filed by the prosecuting attorney inorder to toll the time of limitation unless the criminal case is supersede by a criminal indictment.
Bustamante V. Distrrict Court of the third judicial district, et al, 138 colo page 105, the Colorado Supreme court held with adoption that time is material and must be alleged in an indictment or information when the crime is alleged inorder to toll the time of limitation, 138 colo page 104. The court went on to hold that Colorado is now to be numbered among those jurisdiction where the act alleged in the indictment or information must appear to have been committed within the period prescribed by the statue of limitations or an exception must be setforth such as being a fugitive from the state. 138 colo page 105. The court if the date alleged in the formal complaint is outside the statute of limitation its time barred. Page 105.
In the year 1994, the supreme court went contrary to the above ruling: holding that the statute of limitation was tolled 1990, before a county court complaint was filed in the county court. In that case, a district court information was not stamp filed in the district court until Dec 23, 1992. The crime was alleged to have happen oct 14, 1989. No indication of being a fugitive was alleged in the complaint. Higgins was alleged to have committed theft. Colo statute of limitation on theft was three years. See higgins v. people 868 P2d 371(colo 1994).
Take notice of how the colo. Government uses this case law in other cases throughout the years when putting Higgins v. People, 868 P.2d 371 (Colo.1994) case law in google search engine. And you will not find in google search engine Higgins v. people itself. That fraud by the colo supreme court cost me 8 years. Higgins v. people involved the same facts and law as the above cases but it ruled completely contrary to the entire judicial history dealing with the colo statute of limitation in criminal cases.
When your case finnaly makes it to the United States Supreme Court like Higgins v. people, on a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, the supreme court is not looking at the wrong being done to determine a grantal of a writ of cert. The supreme court only considers as the important of the issues to determine whether this issue raise, effects the nation as a whole. And if the lower court never raised the issue as it effects the nation as a whole, the supreme court will deny your petition without a single reason behind it. Infact, your denial will come from the supreme court clerk- His name is Higgins.
If your issue only involves the wrong done to you when complaining in the petition for writ of cert, its guaranteed to be denied. Or did the supreme court even look at the petition since it was denied by a clerk. Nevertheless, these judges are not only protected through the adoption and rubber stamping by the higher courts, but 28 U.S.C. section 351 to 364 gives judges permission to make wrong decision so long as this decision is done in their judicial capacity.
This permission and ability to make wrong decisions is actually apart of the judges judicial independence. This is why a judge is considered powerful.
I’m requesting the people of America pursuant to the 10th amendment to the United States Constitution to help me change and be a part of history, changing that law that gives judges the permission to make wrong decisions even very wrong decisions in their judicial capacity. All judges are required to be fair and impartial and should and ought to be required to make what thgey believe to be correct and fair decision even if the decision is wrong. Because that would be true appellate error. Corruption is not appellate error. It’s a crime. Appellate rules only apply to appellate errors.
Please click on the above link: and read how God perceive my understanding and sign the petition so I can petition to enforce transparent and account ability corrupt judges who deliberately commit crimes on the bench. No judges are above the law and we are not beneath the constitution….
Please, I also seek donations of pay perclicking on google pay per click site, to the above linked petition.
Petition to protect our kids from judidicial misconduct
